And lo it has come to pass, Starfield looks like it will definitely not be supporting either Nvidia's DLSS or XeSS upscalers. At least not at launch anyways. We kinda thought that would be the case the instant it was announced the , but a dig into the preload files for the game has seemingly confirmed it.
A twitter user, , has been poring through the files on PC, now that the Microsoft store preloads have begun alongside the Xbox X/S. They have posted a shot of the different files and folders and states that there are no sign of any .dlls referring to other upscaling technologies outside of AMD's own FSR 2.
That means, barring a day 1 patch to add support, we're going to be out of luck. And I'm 100% sure Nvidia would have crowed about any involvement in Starfield by now if there was going to be any.
Now, it [[link]] must be said that , or FSR 2, is an agnostic feature that will work on every vendor's graphics card. So all your AMD, Nvidia, and yes, even Intel GPUs will support FSR 2. And it's a very good option, [[link]] far improved over the first generation of the tech, and we can't wait for .
Not having then isn't such a huge miss, they are very similar, though maybe even Intel's upscaler can deliver slightly better visuals than FSR 2. But there's still not a lot in it. More of an issue, for recent Nvidia GPU owners at least, is the fact that DLSS is missing.
DLSS is a superior technology, offering a higher fidelity end product, largely by virtue of the fact that it is a proprietary tech. It utilises the Tensor cores of Nvidia's RTX GPUs to help create the upscaling effect, and it's so good we'd almost always recommend its use. There are basically no downsides.
It's also largely similar, from a developer's perspective, in terms of implementing it into a game. AMD specifically made FSR 2 so that it could be easy for devs to add to games that already support DLSS from version 2.0 and up. It's been estimated that it would take less than three days to get FSR 2 in place in those instances, so it ought to work similarly the other way around, too.
So, why doesn't Starfield include DLSS? Well, therein lies the rub. We can't say for sure, but it certainly looks like it's something to do with that AMD partnership. AMD has studiously refused to answer any questions about whether the terms of partnerships restricts the use of competing upscaling features. Given the fact that historically, Sony titles aside, AMD sponsored games don't support DLSS makes that quite a likely situation.
: The top chips from Intel and AMD.
: The right boards.
: Your perfect pixel-pusher awaits.
: Get into the game ahead of the rest.
It would absolutely be worse if it were the other way around, where it only supported the Nvidia-only DLSS feature, but the green team has been very explicit about the fact it "does not, and will not block, restrict, discourage, or hinder developers from implementing competitor technologies in any way."
Still, at least everyone gets to use a decent upscaler, even if they're blocked from using the best option available for their GPU.
There will inevitably be modders beavering away to jam the DLSS dll files into the game once it is released—one has already —but mods are never going to be as effective as fully realised implementations by the developers [[link]] themselves.
The internet wasn't happy about it when the partnership was launched, and I expect this will keep on riling people up when the game launches without support in September.